Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.


Recent Posts

Pages: 1 ... 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 [10]
91
Other topics / Re: Allsorts of interesting finds
« Last post by SlashNet on 2024.October.07. 10:08:14 »
MikroVilag #03 1991.01
[ Guests cannot view attachments ]

MikroVilag #22 1991.10
[ Guests cannot view attachments ] [ Guests cannot view attachments ]

MikroVilag #23-24 1991.12
[ Guests cannot view attachments ] [ Guests cannot view attachments ] [ Guests cannot view attachments ] [ Guests cannot view attachments ] [ Guests cannot view attachments ] [ Guests cannot view attachments ]

MikroVilag #01 1992.01
[ Guests cannot view attachments ] [ Guests cannot view attachments ] [ Guests cannot view attachments ] [ Guests cannot view attachments ] [ Guests cannot view attachments ] [ Guests cannot view attachments ] [ Guests cannot view attachments ]

MikroVilag #02 1992.02
[ Guests cannot view attachments ] [ Guests cannot view attachments ] [ Guests cannot view attachments ] [ Guests cannot view attachments ]

MikroVilag #03 1992.03
[ Guests cannot view attachments ] [ Guests cannot view attachments ]

MikroVilag #03 1992.03 M Mikmomagazin
[ Guests cannot view attachments ]

MikroVilag #04 1992.04
[ Guests cannot view attachments ] [ Guests cannot view attachments ] [ Guests cannot view attachments ] [ Guests cannot view attachments ]

MikroVilag #04 1992.04 M Mikmomagazin
[ Guests cannot view attachments ]
92
BASIC / Re: String elemeinek összekeverésén alapuló program
« Last post by geco on 2024.October.07. 08:25:53 »
A kérdés, hogy valódi 64K-s Enterprise-okban mennyire gyakori az EXOS 2.1 és a BASIC 2.1.
Hivatalos verzióban ilyen nem nagyon van, hacsak anno, amikor ingyen upgrade-elték az EP64-eket 128-cá, a RAM bővítés mellé a ROM-ot nem cserélték.
Normál esetben EXOS 2.0 , Basic 2.1 kombó nincs, én azon csodálkozom, hogy egyáltalán működik.
Jelen esetben az EXOS verziószám a legfontosab, mert bármennyi memória lehet egy EXOS 2.0-ás gépben Midi lejátszás úgyse lesz, mert nincs benne USER INTERRUPT, és úgy láccik, hogy a BASCIC 2.0 másképp működik a gépi kód meghívása, és ezért dob CALL errort, lehet ott még nem volt paraméterezhető?
93
Other topics / Re: Allsorts of interesting finds
« Last post by SlashNet on 2024.October.06. 23:00:15 »
MikroVilag #03 1990.01
[ Guests cannot view attachments ] [ Guests cannot view attachments ]

MikroVilag #05 1990.02
[ Guests cannot view attachments ] [ Guests cannot view attachments ] [ Guests cannot view attachments ]

MikroVilag #06 1990.03
[ Guests cannot view attachments ] [ Guests cannot view attachments ]

MikroVilag #07 1990.03
[ Guests cannot view attachments ] [ Guests cannot view attachments ] [ Guests cannot view attachments ]

MikroVilag #08 1990.04
[ Guests cannot view attachments ]

MikroVilag #09 1990.04
[ Guests cannot view attachments ] [ Guests cannot view attachments ]

MikroVilag #15 1990.07
[ Guests cannot view attachments ]

MikroVilag #20 1990.09
[ Guests cannot view attachments ] [ Guests cannot view attachments ] [ Guests cannot view attachments ] [ Guests cannot view attachments ]

94
BASIC / Re: String elemeinek összekeverésén alapuló program
« Last post by szipucsu on 2024.October.06. 22:48:45 »
Próbáltam emun
exos 2.0   basic 2.1  64k nincs midi hang
exos 2.1   basic 2.1  64k van midi hang
basic 2.0 CALL error
A kérdés, hogy valódi 64K-s Enterprise-okban mennyire gyakori az EXOS 2.1 és a BASIC 2.1.
95
Other topics / Re: Allsorts of interesting finds
« Last post by SlashNet on 2024.October.06. 22:44:36 »
MikroVilag #01 1989.01
[ Guests cannot view attachments ] [ Guests cannot view attachments ]

MikroVilag #02 1989.01
[ Guests cannot view attachments ] [ Guests cannot view attachments ]

MikroVilag #03 1989.02
[ Guests cannot view attachments ]

MikroVilag #08 1989.04
[ Guests cannot view attachments ]

MikroVilag #11 1989.05
[ Guests cannot view attachments ] [ Guests cannot view attachments ] [ Guests cannot view attachments ]

MikroVilag #13 1989.06
[ Guests cannot view attachments ]

MikroVilag #15 1989.07
[ Guests cannot view attachments ] [ Guests cannot view attachments ] [ Guests cannot view attachments ] [ Guests cannot view attachments ] [ Guests cannot view attachments ]

MikroVilag #16 1989.08
[ Guests cannot view attachments ]

MikroVilag #18 1989.08
[ Guests cannot view attachments ] [ Guests cannot view attachments ]

MikroVilag #24 1989.11
[ Guests cannot view attachments ] [ Guests cannot view attachments ] [ Guests cannot view attachments ]
96
Other topics / Re: Allsorts of interesting finds
« Last post by SlashNet on 2024.October.06. 22:28:53 »
All issues are here: https://c64.rulez.org/pub/c64.hu/Konyvek/m/Mikrovilag%5bretroujsag.com%5d/

Mikrovilág #3 1986.03
[ Guests cannot view attachments ]

Mikrovilág #14 1987.09
[ Guests cannot view attachments ]

MikroVilag #6 1988.03
[ Guests cannot view attachments ] [ Guests cannot view attachments ] [ Guests cannot view attachments ]

MikroVilag #11 1988.05
[ Guests cannot view attachments ] [ Guests cannot view attachments ]

MikroVilag #12 1988.06
[ Guests cannot view attachments ] [ Guests cannot view attachments ]

MikroVilag #14 1988.07
[ Guests cannot view attachments ] [ Guests cannot view attachments ]

MikroVilag #15 1988.07
[ Guests cannot view attachments ] [ Guests cannot view attachments ] [ Guests cannot view attachments ]

MikroVilag #20 1988.09
[ Guests cannot view attachments ]

MikroVilag #23 1988.11
[ Guests cannot view attachments ]

MikroVilag #24 1988.11
[ Guests cannot view attachments ]

MikroVilag #25 1988.12
[ Guests cannot view attachments ]

MikroVilag #26 1988.12
[ Guests cannot view attachments ] [ Guests cannot view attachments ]
97
BASIC / Re: String elemeinek összekeverésén alapuló program
« Last post by Ferro73 on 2024.October.06. 21:57:11 »
Igen, nekem is ez tűnt fel, hogy ha ALLOCATE 40 van a 180 helyett, az is sok neki, és leállt. Nem tudom, hogy az ALLOCATE és az EP64 milyen szinten utálják egymást, ezek szerint nagyon.
Próbáltam emun
exos 2.0   basic 2.1  64k nincs midi hang
exos 2.1   basic 2.1  64k van midi hang
basic 2.0 CALL error
98
BASIC / Re: String elemeinek összekeverésén alapuló program
« Last post by szipucsu on 2024.October.06. 21:33:57 »
IS-BASIC v2.0 valamiért nem tűri az ALLOCATE variációt.
Igen, nekem is ez tűnt fel, hogy ha ALLOCATE 40 van a 180 helyett, az is sok neki, és leállt. Nem tudom, hogy az ALLOCATE és az EP64 milyen szinten utálják egymást, ezek szerint nagyon.

Quote
Ezért javasolnám
Code: [Select]
300 IF SPEEK(4,14821)=30 THEN
301 PRINT "A program nem tud megfeloen "
302 PRINT "futni ezert leall."
303 PRINT "Ha futtatni szeretne"
304 PRINT "szerezze be az IS-BASIC v2.1"
305 END  
Vagy akkor készíteni egy külön EP64-es, külön EP128-as verziót a programból.
De Zzzippel a probléma nem jelentkezik, tehát igazából semmit nem kell csinálni. :D
99
BASIC / Re: String elemeinek összekeverésén alapuló program
« Last post by Ferro73 on 2024.October.06. 20:31:54 »
Szóval a próbálkozásom eredménye idáig.
IS-BASIC v2.0 valamiért nem tűri az ALLOCATE variációt.
Ezért javasolnám
Code: [Select]
300 IF SPEEK(4,14821)=30 THEN
301 PRINT "A program nem tud megfeloen "
302 PRINT "futni ezert leall."
303 PRINT "Ha futtatni szeretne"
304 PRINT "szerezze be az IS-BASIC v2.1"
305 END 
100
BASIC / Re: String elemeinek összekeverésén alapuló program
« Last post by Ferro73 on 2024.October.06. 19:08:53 »
Kipróbálom 64k BASIC 2.0.
Hátha csak BASIC kezeli másként az ALOCATEt.
Pages: 1 ... 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 [10]