For the answer try this test on various computers:
10 FOR I=1 TO 10 STEP 0.1
20 PRINT I
30 IF I=1.3 THEN STOP
40 NEXT I

I have tested it with a small modification which accepts all computers:
10 FOR I=1 TO 10 STEP 0.1
20 PRINT I
30 IF I=1.3 THEN GOTO 50
40 NEXT I
50 REM
Amstrad CPC    counts until 10
Commodore +4   counts until 10
Commodore 128  counts until 10
Commodore 64   counts until 10
Enterprise     counts until 1.3 ok
Videoton TVC   counts until 1.3 ok
ZX Spectrum    counts until 10


Amstrad CPC    counts until 10

And print crazy values
[ Guests cannot view attachments ]

ENTERPRISE and TVC represent floating-point numbers on a BCD basis, while the more common Microsoft BASIC represents them on a binary basis. Since computer processors work in binary, they can process numbers represented in this way faster.
On the other hand, it is not possible, or hardly possible, to express decimal fractions exactly with binary numbers. That is also why, when I studied programming in high school, it was expressly forbidden to test the equality of two decimal fractions in conditional instructions.
In terms of accuracy, ENTERPRISE and TVC spoil us, but the calculation is slower.
Bruce Tanner also wrote about this in one of his posts during the creation of TVC BASIC.

I'm sorry, my knowledge of the English language is weak, I hope it can be understood with google translator.

Trefe

.....

Az ENTERPRISE és a TVC BCD alapon ábrázolják a lebegőpontos számokat, míg az elterjedtebb Microsoft BASIC pedig binárisan. Mivel a számítógépek processzorai binárisan működnek, ezért az így ábrázolt számokat gyorsabban fel tudják dolgozni.
Viszont bináris számokkal pontosan kifejezni a tizedes törteket nem, vagy alig lehet. Ezért is volt annak idején, mikor programozást tanultam a középiskolában, hogy kifejezetten tiltották két tizedes törtszám egyenlőségének vizsgálatát a feltételes utasításokban.
Pontosság szempontjából az ENTERPRISE és a TVC elkényeztet minket, viszont lassabb a számolás.
Erről írt is valamelyik posztjában Bruce Tanner a TVC BASIC készítésénél.

Sanálom, az angol nyelv tudásom gyenge, remélem google translatorral is érthető.

Trefe

It is more the contrary... the EP uses correct precision on BCD, while Microsoft uses an approximation.

The more accurate calculation makes the EP slower.

But more usable for math calculations! EP have a 10 BCD digit. At my school time available calculators only have a 8 digit.

...which also affects (slows down) the compiled versions...

Would be nice if Enterprise basic had a way to limit that precision for improved performance.

...which also affects (slows down) the compiled versions...

Compiled version does not slow down (if you mean ZZZIP compiler) it works only with integers and if i remember well from -32768 to 32767.

But more usable for math calculations! EP have a 10 BCD digit. At my school time available calculators only have a 8 digit.

In addition, EP uses 12 digits for internal calculations. It only gives us a value rounded to 10 digits. (see EXOS ROM 0/1 disassembly, RST10 routines and table of internal constants.)

Trefe