Enterprise Forever
:UK => Other topics => Topic started by: jonesypeter on 2016.February.24. 22:57:03
-
This appeared in the UK Computing magazine. I don't think its fair that the Enterprise appeared here:
http://www.computing.co.uk/ctg/feature/2442720/top-10-worst-computers
It was a great machine, just a little too late.
-
most of the people thinks: worst=non popular. or worst=business fail.
these people are stupid and cowards.
-
I think the journalist unknows all about the computers he is reviewing. He only is repeating what is already written, and so he is only simplifying the stories he has found on the wiki to fit on a few lines.
His blatant ignorance is clearly noticeable when he says "the Amstrad CPC-464 offered more for less"....
But, what can be said from a newsman that makes a list of the worst computers...
He is only making a laugh of who bought one of that computers and not one of the winners of other so stupid list....
What is this, religion?, football? implies that if you have a computer you hate all others?
Who loves computers, loves all the computers, even those worst ones....
Edit: I have put this same message on that page as a comment....
-
Yes, he is totally stupid :-(
-
Yes, he is totally stupid :-(
Click-bait article, as it often is the case with these "top 10" lists.
most of the people thinks: worst=non popular. or worst=business fail.
Even by the popularity metric, it is probably not accurate, because there are likely computers so unpopular (or sold only in specific countries) that the author never heard of them.